May 9, 2019 | aging, aging investor, cost of aging, declining health, diminished cognition, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, financial capacity, financial elder abuse, financial judgement, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, resources for senior, resources for seniors, scammers, senior citizen investor, senior investor, seniors finances
The Senior Safe Act allows you to hold transactions when you suspect financial abuse of a client. The Act is designed, at least in theory, to allow time for the trusted contacts you have on file to take appropriate action. Many of those victimized by predators or manipulated by unscrupulous family have dementia and have lost their judgment about what makes sense financially. The Act urges you to get trusted contacts and provides that you are not breaking privacy rules to contact them in the reasonable belief that your client is being financially abused. The length of time you can hold a requested transaction can be as long as a month. This is where the Senior Safe Act has missed the mark.
Let’s look at the reality of impaired elders who are in charge of their wealth on the family trust. The trust is in order, and if the elder recognizes that he or she is experiencing decline in mental ability, that trustee may choose to resign. Simple. But that is not what happens in too many cases. For many persons who have cognitive decline and dementia, the elder does not recognize that he is impaired at all. “I feel fine!” he tells his worried family. When asked to resign as trustee, having total control over (theoretically) millions of dollars in a trust, the elder flatly and stubbornly refuses. Meanwhile, financial abuse by predatory people can continue unabated.
When an older person experiences cognitive decline, it typically has a very slow onset. Short-term memory loss does not raise enough red flags for those closest to the elder to take any action. “She’s just getting old” they say dismissively. But memory loss is often the first and earliest warning sign of Alzheimer’s disease, the most common form of dementia. The odds of having Alzheimer’s disease by age 85 are at least one in three. Think about your own older clients. Some live well beyond age 85. The risk of dementia rises with age. Short-term memory loss interfering with daily life is not a normal part of aging. Financial abuse and cognitive impairment often go together.
When financial abuse reaches a visible level, the advisor may do what the law allows and call the trusted contact person, usually an adult child. The advisor hopes that the call will somehow trigger something and the abuse will be stopped. But here is a reality check: The family can’t accomplish anything needed in two weeks or even a month if you hold transactions then. Here is a real case example of just such a situation, showing how long it really did take.
In our work with a family at AgingParents.com we saw rampant financial abuse of an elder by a family member. The elder had dementia but had not been formally diagnosed by his doctor. Over 70% of his income was going to the predator. He was asked to resign as trustee by his two adult children, who were reasonably worried that he was going to give away all his cash and further encumber his home. The dad, whom we’ll call Gene, had been developing dementia for at least two years. He felt obligated to the predator and was totally powerless in resisting her demands for money. He just kept writing checks, draining his own resources. It was clearly a case of financial manipulation.
We were involved in working to persuade Gene to allow what his family trust provided: to have his daughter, Jennie, become the successor trustee. He agreed, then reneged. He accepted the logic and then refused to accept it. The kids had no choice but to use the law to take over control. Their father was too stubborn to resign as trustee when asked, even with the entire family presenting a united front, asking and respectfully begging.
The trust, like many such documents provided that Gene could be removed as trustee by his appointed successor, his daughter, after two physicians had declared him to be incapacitated for handling his own finances. A court decision was not required. However, getting him to two doctors willing to assess him and put their observations in writing was a challenge that took months to accomplish. The total time spent getting the change of trustees accomplished according to the terms of Gene’s trust was eight months.
His children were the trusted contacts in the advisor’s file. They knew about the abuse and were in agreement with the advisor that Gene had to stop being the trustee. The adult children had to hire consultants (AgingParents.com), have meetings, hire an attorney, and try various methods to get the job done. Their time energy and thousands of dollars were expended to prevent an even worse outcome, which was being left to support their aging father if he were to totally deplete his own funds.
The takeaways:
- Though well intended, we do not expect that the Senior Safe Act will do much to stop financial abuse because of the short time allowed for a financial professional to hold transactions. In Gene’s case, the predator would have been happy to wait a mere two weeks or a month before resuming the financial manipulation of Gene.
- Know that any older impaired client may not understand that he or she is cognitively impaired and will ignore pleas to resign as trustee with total control over any family trust.
- If you see that an older client is showing signs of cognitive decline, do not wait until it gets worse. Reach out at the time of your first suspicions of trouble. The family or other trusted persons may well have a better opportunity to persuade an elder to transfer power over finances to the appointed successor before complete loss of capacity. Expect this to take time.
In the case described above as a result of ongoing financial abuse, nearly all of Gene’s cash was depleted during the eight months of effort on the part of his adult children to have him removed. The advisor did the right thing but too much of Gene’s cash was depleted in the period when the abuser could keep manipulating him for those months of effort by family to have him removed as trustee.
By Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Elder law attorney, AgingInvestor.com
If you are seeing abuse and feel lost about how to stop it, contact us at AgingInvestor.com for a confidential consultation with our nurse-lawyer, geriatric psychologist team so you can do everything possible to protect your vulnerable client.
Feb 21, 2019 | aging, aging investor, cost of aging, cost of long term care, declining health, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, health, long term care insurance, resources for senior, resources for seniors, retirement planning, senior citizen investor, senior investor, seniors finances
It used to be that we could think of retirement in a kind of predictable way. People lived into their 70s perhaps, and we measured retirement by that. We used tables, algorithms and other tools to tell us how much we should save and how much we could spend in retirement. And it was all based on assumptions that may no longer apply.
Life expectancy for a woman in the U.S. in 2018 was 84 years. For a man, the figure is 80 years. Those averages do not take into account the fact that well educated and financially secure people live longer than average. This is presumably based on the notion that people who know what a healthy lifestyle is and who can afford the best medical care will outlive those who do not have those advantages. In my own county, for example, which has a high proportion of elders compared to other counties in California, one wealthy city shows a life expectancy for men of 93 years.
Suppose that your aging client lives to be 93, having retired at age 65. That's 28 years of retirement. What the algorithms don't clarify is what you, the advisor needs to plan for with your client during the last decade of life, from 83-93. No formula is going to help you with the individual discriminations you need to make concerning your client's risks for care and how to assess and plan for them. They can be a substantial cost, out of pocket, not covered by Medicare, and absolutely necessary.
The way we age is determined by two main factors: hereditary tendency and lifestyle. Our genetic makeup directs only about 30% of the equation. The other 70% is driven by the way we choose to live our lives. There are plenty of folks who think that a healthy lifestyle is just too much bother. They avoid exercise, eat whatever they feel like eating, never learn to manage stress and say they'd rather die a few years sooner than give up their habits, which their doctor advises against.
Here's the problem with that belief. Leading an unhealthy lifestyle does not just cause you to "die sooner". Rather, it may likely cause you to live with impairments, disabilities and a need for expensive long term care for chronic health conditions. These can go on for decades.
Take obesity, for example. Over two-thirds of Americans are overweight or obese. Obviously excess weight increases our risks for all manner of health issues, including diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, and strokes. When a doctor makes a diagnosis of one of these, the person doesn't typically just die on the spot and save a lot of expense later on. No. The medical providers will keep the person going with medications, surgery in some cases, lots of diagnostic monitoring and trips to the doctors. These chronic conditions usually lead to disability late in life, particularly when more than one of them exists in the same person.
If you have aging clients, you definitely need to understand health risks in a basic way, so that you can help your clients set aside funds for the care they are likely to need in the last years of their retirement lives. All of the chronic conditions I mentioned are manageable with an effort toward a healthy lifestyle but for those who do not wish to do the work involved, you can bet on a likely need for long term care. While you can't predict the future, you can plan for risk. It's what you do.
My own mother in law had high blood pressure and chronic kidney disease for decades. She worked vigorously at diet, exercise, social activities and other components of a healthy lifestyle. Heredity was not on her side. She lived to be 96. During the last 3 years of her life, she needed help. She moved to a seniors' community where help was available and eventually, she paid for private caregivers. Her cost of living at the last part of her life was $120,000 a year. If this were your client, would he or she have at the ready $360,000 to pay for care? How about if there was no pursuit of a great lifestyle? The care expense could easily be 10 years.
The takeaway here is that advising for longevity needs to include the skill of assessing fundamental health risks that create a need for out of pocket, long term care. You don't need to be a doctor and you can't predict everything, but you can do what is reasonable to help your client plan. Ask the right questions. Keep track of your client's general health picture.
To learn more about what to look for and what to ask, get Hidden Truths About Retirement & Long Term Care, available at AgingInvestor.com and on Amazon.
By Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Elder law attorney, AgingInvestor.com
Feb 13, 2019 | ageist, aging investor, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, investor, retirement planning, senior citizen investor, senior investor, seniors finances
In a conversation with a prominent retired financial advisor from a large institution, I heard the following:
“Financial advisors are not interested in retired people. They’re taking money out. The advisors are interested in investors who are putting money in, not the other way around.”
Just hearing this generalization, whether true or not, gave me a kind of sick feeling in the pit of my stomach. Millions of Boomers fall into this category of retired. If their advisors lose interest in them when they are no longer increasing their investments, where does that leave the retired person in need of advice? The generalization sounded like age discrimination.
As a professional devoted to the well-being, financial safety and quality of life of older adults, I can only hope the statements I heard about lack of interest are untrue. I have met plenty of financial advisors who are indeed interested in maintaining their relationships with their oldest clients, not just based on whether the portfolio is increasing. They actually do care about the clients. For them, it’s not just an empty advertising slogan. I hope this is the majority!
Millions of clients served by advisors will retire soon enough or these clients are already in that phase of their lives. Competent financial advisors who have the ethics they hold themselves out as having will increase their skills in planning for lifespans for some of their clients who will live into their 90s and beyond. No logarithm nor mathematical table will do a complete job of this.
Here are some of the areas involved in longevity planning that the best advisors will fully understand by their increased training and preparation:
- Social Security, and how to maximize the benefit.
Particularly with married couples, this requires specialized knowledge in order to give appropriate advice. When I asked my own long time B-D at our financial institution about it, he was very vague and couldn’t even refer me to anyone who could answer questions my husband and I raised. We fired him. We found an independent advisor who was very knowledgeable about Social Security. We referred three other people to this new advisor in the meantime and all became his clients. Take heed. Word spreads.
- Long term care planning.
Telling a client who is reluctant to purchase long term care insurance that self-insuring is a choice is fine, but the longevity advisor understands how to address the risk of needing long term care and has actual figures at hand to spell this out for the client. If this is not your area of expertise, you can get a clear understanding of the costs of all types of long term care in my book, Hidden Truths About Retirement & Long Term Care. About 70% of people will need some long term care at some point. Know what it costs.
- The nexus between financial planning and estate planning.
It never fails to surprise me about the disconnect between the financial advisor and the client’s estate planning attorney. Both should be working together to ensure that the client’s later years are financially safe. Successor trustees should be known by both the advisor and the lawyer, so that if a client begins to show cognitive decline, they can coordinate efforts to have the named successor take over decision making at the appropriate time. If you are worried about confidentiality of protected information, get the client’s permission in advance of any impairments, to communicate with the attorney involved. In other words, do this at the time of retirement.
- Targeting relationship building with the next generation.
- A loss of interest in a retired client deprives the advisor of a huge opportunity. That is, to establish a connection to and trust with your retired client’s heirs. Have you even spoken with any of them at the point of the aging investor’s retirement? If not, you have an explanation for the reason why about 80% of the heirs move their inherited assets to someone else after the patriarch or matriarch dies. The heirs can get to know you well in advance if you invite them, with your client’s permission of course, into the planning conversations. Don’t lose that chance.
In a nutshell, the older client needs the skill the financial advisor has and retirement should not change the advisor’s interest level. Keeping clients for life takes an understanding of longevity. Make it your business to do just that.
Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Elder law attorney, AgingInvestor.com
Jan 25, 2019 | aging investor, financial advisors, investor
Do any of your
older clients have a problem with alcohol or addiction? You may be surprised at
the prevalence of these problems in our older population.
Opioid
addiction is not just about young people. Some sources tell us that opioid
dependency is present among people of all ages, which can include your aging
investor clients. According to a treatment facility exclusively for adults over age 50, the number of
adults over 50 with substance abuse problems will double from 2.5 million in
1999 to 5million in 2020.
Why
should this matter to you, as an advisor? There are several reasons why this
client health issue is important, particularly in retirement planning. First,
any substance abuse problem can affect financial decision-making capacity.
Dependency can lead to desperation, related physical issues added to existing
age-related issues and loss of capacity to make reasonable and necessary
judgments about any investment. Further, it can destroy family relationships,
just when you may need family members to get involved in helping an older
client make essential decisions about the portfolio and needed adjustments.
Your
aging client may not tell you about being substance dependent but sometimes you
can see the signs. They may confess to "a bit of drinking too much",
or feeling depressed about their future. Perhaps
the client comes to your office reeking of alcohol. Or you see them taking
pills right in front of you, with a shaking hand. That behavior doesn't look to
you like just some benign blood pressure pill or the like. There's a frantic
air to it, needing that pill fix. You can't be sure but your gut tells you
something isn't right. Listen to your gut.
Elders with a
drinking problem are not often talked about but we certainly hear about the
issues they cause at AgingParents.com, where we work with families to solve
problems with the elders and their adult children. According to publications at
the National Institutes of Health, prevalence rates for older-adult at-risk
drinking (defined as more than 3 drinks on one occasion or more than 7 drinks
per week) are estimated to be 16.0% for men and 10.9% for women. There is
also a substantial proportion of the older-adult population who are binge
drinkers (generally, 5 or more drinks per episode). This is not some small
problem among us.
You're not a
doctor, nor a mental health professional. Why should you care? Should you do
anything about a client who appears to you to show signs of substance abuse
risk? It can affect your client relationship if you do nothing. Your client can
accelerate age-related physical decline faster with substance problems than if
they aren't part of the picture. If they decline too much, you can't work with
them. If the client can't communicate or can't make decisions, you may have to
get rid of the client and the fees you earn on managing that portfolio. The
client can ruin your connection to them.
Have a plan
You can think
ahead and develop a plan if you suspect these issues are affecting your client.
One
essential strategy involves being prepared to reach out to your client's family
or close friends for help. Many, though not all investors have done some estate
planning. Often they wanted to protect their legacy and had a trust and will
drawn up by an attorney. Imagine that all their financial assets you manage are
in a trust. The trust will name a successor to your client, who is the person
who decided what the trust should contain. The successor trustee can assume
authority while your client is living, when he or she becomes impaired. Trusts
are written in many ways with no standard applied to when an impaired trustee,
your client, must or can step down and let the successor take over.
What to do first
You
can speak with your client about whether they have done estate planning. This
should be part of your job anyway. You don't want them to fail to do this and
have too much of their assets unnecessarily given to taxes after they pass or
have them go where the client didn't want them to go. Educate them. That's what
you do as part of your services. While you are on the question, find out whom
they've appointed as a successor trustee (assuming there is indeed a family
trust). Then ask for permission, in
writing to communicate with that successor trustee, whom they chose,
"in case of emergency" or some other event that may cause them to be
unable to function, such as a stroke. For help in getting the permission right,
reach out to us at AgingInvestor.com. We can help!
How to use permission to
communicate with a third party
That
permission will give you one essential thing: the ability to tell the appointed
person that you are worried about what you have observed (be specific; e.g., strong
odor of alcohol, forgetting appointments, etc.). You can simply request their
help. It's up to them to take it from there. You may not be able to solve any
problem your client has but with this kind of communication, you are doing all
you have a right or obligation to do to be of service. And who knows, your
contact with the right and motivated appointee, often a family member, could be
the trigger that starts their stepping in to assist with financial decisions.
Try this and you'll sleep better at night rather than worrying that your impaired client may do something dumb with their money, and expose you to scrutiny by heirs for your failure to act. This simple and proactive step can apply not only to a client you think may have a problem, but to any aging client. Make it your practice. It can prevent your loss of management of the client's assets.
Nov 15, 2018 | aging, aging investor, cost of aging, cost of long term care, custodial care, declining health, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, financial capacity, financial judgement, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, health, investor, long term care, seniors finances
Your clients are getting ready for retirement. You’ve done the calculations, balanced the portfolio and advised them of what income to expect. You’ve discussed how much spending is ok. You used your program and your analysis was thorough. You’ve done your job, right?
Not exactly. There is probably no algorithm nor program that will calculate your client’s individual profile of health risks that will likely lead to the expense of long term care. That can be a whopper. Maybe you’ve suggested long term care insurance. Most people don’t choose to buy it. For those who do, the benefits are limited and the “elimination period” (deductible) is thousands of dollars. There go your careful calculations. At least 90% of folks don’t have that coverage. Now what?
But how can you predict what’s going to happen to anyone’s health in retirement, you ask. You can’t be precise, but you surely can make some rational observations and give advice accordingly. Those observations consist of two parts: what you can see with your own eyes and what you can glean by asking a few basic questions. If you think asking any client about their health conditions is too nosy or not your job, consider that if the client needs long term care and runs out of money because of it, they’re not going to think much of you. And the cost can wipe out their security.
Asking about health issues is not nosy at all. Rather, it’s what any smart advisor planning for longevity must do. Let’s not keep pretending that everyone stays the same physically and mentally from the start of retirement to end of life. Our bodies go through wear and tear and things break down. Cognitive decline affects at least a third of people who reach the age of 85. The risk of Alzheimer’s disease keeps climbing after that. Now, what was that life expectancy you were using in your calculation? Was it age 99?
Let’s start with what you can see in your client with your own eyes. (If they’re not in front of you, perhaps Skype is an option). Is your client obese, as about 40% of the U.S. population is? This leads to heart disease, stroke, and diabetes, among other diseases and conditions. The medical care people receive in many cases will save them from dying but they then live with disabilities. And yes, they will be very likely to need expensive long term care. Neither health insurance nor Medicare will cover long term care. Such help as a part time caregiver at home is how most folks start out with long term care. Your client pays out of pocket most of the time. Did you calculate how much it costs as well as how long they will likely need it? If they have multiple medical conditions, and have started long term care, they’ll probably continue to need some form of it for all their remaining years.
Find out what you may not know from simply observing your client’s appearance by asking questions. You can make your own list or get a health care provider to help you with a few targeted questions. You will need to educate your client as to the reason why you need this information. It’s to help them plan for how much to save in their retirement years.
Here are some examples of basic questions that can help you predict the need for possible long term care:
- How’s your health these days? Has a doctor told you that you have any long term conditions?
- Are you taking medications? What are they for?
- Do you smoke?
- Are you concerned at all about any health issues you have at this time?
- Do you recall your parents’ ages when they died?
Your aging clients will not be eager to talk about the potential need for long term care. When you told them about what to expect for “out of pocket medical costs in retirement”, you did not give them a figure that included long term care. Long term care is not “medical” according to Medicare. Rather, it is called “custodial care”. The client probably will not bring it up, so you must do this.
When you have done your observations and gotten answers to your health-risk related questions at least there is a place to start a meaningful conversation. You can give them figures as to the cost of typical kinds of care, such as a non-medical home care worker. We at AgingInvestor.com recommend starting your projections at age 80 as to when a person might need physical help. Many of us know someone who did require help with at least some part of his or her life at that age. Then you can talk about how any condition your client identifies for you, such as high blood pressure, diabetes, etc. as shortening normal life expectancy and increasing the risk for needing help. If your client already has difficulty with some normal daily activity such as walking or bathing, they are definitely at high risk for needing paid help sooner than a person without these problems.
Clients may be completely unaware of such things as the hourly cost of a home care worker, what assisted living costs each month and what home modifications cost if they are able to remain in their own home. You can find a thorough discussion of these and many other parts of long term care in our book, Hidden Truths About Retirement & Long Term Care, written specifically for financial advisors like you.
Every conscientious advisor needs to wake up to the reality that your retirement income calculator omits the reality check of health problems. We’re not talking about nursing homes, but every other kind of care and help most people will need as they age. If you do want to help clients who are reaching retirement age to plan realistically, include the health risks you can see or learn about by asking.
By Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Elder law attorney, AgingInvestor.com
