Jan 12, 2017 | aging, aging investor, Alzheimer's disease, diminished cognition, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, financial capacity, financial elder abuse, financial judgement, handling money for seniors, investor, scammers, senior citizen investor, senior investor, seniors finances, wealth transfer
A Lurking Danger You Need To Warn Your Clients About
There is nothing wrong with putting on a dinner or lunch for prospects while you give them a pitch about a product you like. But unfortunately, a free meal brings people out, especially older folks and they become sales targets for unscrupulous people. FINRA, in seeing how these seminars are too often a vehicle for fraud and exaggeration preying on unsuspecting elders, has issued a warning to seniors. You can be the messenger to provide a heads-up for your own clients about this.
Too many unethical people are using the setting of a free lunch to sell inappropriate investments. The annuity scams are notorious for this. And the scammers love impaired elders who are so easy to fool.
As people age, about a third of them will develop Alzheimer’s Disease. Most of the victims of this insidious disease are women. When the earliest signs of the disease emerge, research tells us that impairment of financial judgment is already underway. The predators have no trouble talking a senior who lacks the ability to see a scam coming into buying whatever they're selling. It happens every day, not just in the free lunch seminar.
FINRA's alert for investors about “free lunch” investment seminars is specific. Your older clients might not get that alert unless it comes through you. Here’s the gist of what FINRA wants seniors to know.
The FINRA Investor Education Foundation researched people over 40 to find out how many have been solicited with offers for a free meal seminar. 64 percent of respondents had been solicited, which means that the odds are, your clients will be among them. What the research also showed was that half of the sales materials contained claims that were apparently exaggerated, misleading or otherwise unwarranted. 13 percent of these seminars appeared to involve fraud, such as unfounded projections of returns and sales of nonexistent products
Slick and unscrupulous “advisors” and sellers have been at this for years, pitching unsuitable products. They’ve stepped up their game as the population ages. They want every target they can get. An easy way to warn your clients is to give them a one-sheet Client Update we have created for you. Get yours here or by clicking below and send it out to everyone in your book of business. Some of them are older clients and some have aging parents or grandparents who need to know about this.
You'll look good by showing that you care about what happens to your clients and they'll appreciate the message.
You can improve your expertise with your older clients in a book written especially for you, Succeed With Senior Clients, A Financial Advisor's Guide to Best Practices. Get your copy by clicking here.
Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Elder Law Attorney, AgingInvestor.com and AgingParents.com
Sep 22, 2016 | aging investor, elder investor, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, investor, senior citizen investor, senior investor, seniors finances
Attention Financial Advisors:Do You Have A Colleague With Cognitive Impairment?
The financial services industry frequently shows concern about the problems of longevity and aging clients. Cognitive impairment, diminished capacity and dementia get air time with various solutions, mostly vague, offered by industry insiders. But one problem is not being addressed: the professional herself with cognitive impairment.
It's time to look at this as a real risk, not some unlikely possibility that can easily be taken care of by a succession plan for the professional's business. Dementia is a complicated disease. It sneaks up on people, with the early warning signs of short-term memory loss, followed by increasing difficulty with reasoning and judgment. If we had not witnessed this at AgingInvestor.com with impaired professionals ourselves, we might be fooled into thinking that professionals had figured out how to address it. Simply put, they haven't.
Let's look at the notion that all you need is a succession plan for your business and there will be no problem if you develop cognitive impairment yourself, or someone in your organization does. What's the flaw in this? It is that many people with early Alzheimer's or other dementia do not recognize that they are impaired. This phenomenon is called anosagnosia, an inability or refusal to recognize a defect or disorder that is clinically evident. Ironically, the part of the brain that reasons and analyzes is so affected by the disease that it is not able to process the information about one's own impairment.
How this plays out is that as a person ages and becomes more at risk for dementia, some will surely fall victim to brain disease. The odds are at least one in three by the time we reach age 85. The risk doubles about every 5 years starting at age 65. So some financial professionals are going to develop dementia and some will not know that they have any impairment. So they keep working. Others around them are afraid to raise the topic when alarming signs first appear. No protocol exists to ease a person out of the role to which they are accustomed, particularly when they tell you they're feeling just fine, thank you.
Busting The Myths
Myths exist. The first is that a financial professional, whether managing money for clients, selling products or addressing their taxes and accounting, will know that he or she needs to retire when the time comes. This is not what occurs. Many folks who have a good book of business and enjoy what they do will not look to retire by a certain age. They keep working, and consequently when they are impaired they put every client at risk.
Another myth is that somehow the doctor, the family or someone else will advise you when you have dementia and you will of course agree with their assessment. Denial is a frequent component of cognitive impairment, rooted deeply in fear of losing control over one's life. Even those who start to see and fear their own early difficulties with memory will cover it up, avoid facing it and carry on as if everything is fine. Even an annual physical checkup with the doctor is very unlikely to reveal the early warning signs of dementia unless the patient mentions cognitive problems to the examining doctor.
What Can Professionals Do?
As described in detail in Succeed With Senior Clients: A Financial Advisor's Guide to Best Practices, every organization needs a protocol to address the risk of diminished capacity in an impaired colleague. Few firms have a mandatory retirement age, but this option exists.
A protocol for advisors and others can look similar to the protocol every professional needs for aging clients. First, one needs a standardized way to spot the red flags of diminished capacity. Next, these must be regularly documented and contact with the potentially impaired client must increase. Third, a standard way to escalate the issue to knowledgeable others in the firm should exist. For clients who demonstrate the red flags, the organization must have a next step, which means contacting an appointed third party to become a surrogate decision maker. For professionals, a mandatory way to ease the person out of the job on a specific timeline should be in place, and this should become office policy.
It is time for every professional to look at the reality of the risk we all face with impaired cognition. It can happen to anyone. Your professional skill does not protect you from dementia. Wise planning for how you or your colleague would exit your job when you can't see why you need to must be on everyone's agenda.
By Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, & Dr. Mikol Davis Geriatric Psychologist
AgingInvestor.com
Jun 14, 2016 | aging, aging investor, financial elder abuse, senior citizen investor, senior investor
In his recent WSJ article, wealth advisor Paul Hynes raises this question. He points out that financial advisors are in a unique position to observe their clients over years, sometimes decades and they know their clients’ normal patterns and general life situations.
I am particularly interested in the subject and I agree with Mr. Hynes that advisors are well positioned to learn of changes in clients’ lives and to see red flags such as unusual activity in their accounts. He suggests that advisors should stay in communication with their clients’ families and that Adult Protective Services can be contacted if abuse is suspected. Here is where I question his advice as falling a bit short of what can be done.
As part of the national legal community dedicating time to the protection of vulnerable elders I see communications from lawyers all over the U.S. with complaints that Adult Protective Services are not taking financial elder abuse seriously enough in many places. When it is reported, APS may dismiss it as “a civil matter” in which they have no interest. APS is essentially an investigative help to the criminal justice system. It can intervene when an elder is in physical danger. Social workers and investigators from APS look into reports of abuse and help the DA determine whether there is evidence sufficient to prosecute a crime. If the matter involves the undue influence of a family member and the elder seems willing to give away money, even if duped into doing so, APS is unlikely to take any action.
Financial advisors must not rely on the idea that APS will protect their clients when abuse is suspected. Particularly in the case of family, close associates, and caregivers, APS may not wish to interfere unless or until an obvious crime has been committed. If is it not so obvious, it is up to others to take action to stop abuse. These others can include financial advisors, who may be in a highly trusted position with the elder. Advisors will see unusual withdrawals in the account or other signs of danger.
The financial services industry, generally, has avoided certain kinds of communication with family of aging investors due to privacy laws, concerns which they interpret as precluding them from sharing financial information. I do not agree that privacy should stop advisors from communication with family when an elder clearly needs protective action. There is a way around the privacy question. Policy can be created to obtain from every client a signed permission to communicate with a family member or trusted other appointed to step in when the advisor (and her compliance department or officer) has reasonably concluded that the elder is being taken advantage of financially or otherwise.
In his article, Paul Hynes suggests that wealth advisors should follow the notion “if you see something, say something” and I wholeheartedly agree. However, the industry needs to develop new, forward looking, senior specific policies to address what Hynes correctly points out as the rampant problem of elder abuse.
I’m doing my part to help by developing educational materials (Including books and online courses) for industry professionals to recognize the red flags warning of potential abuse, diminished financial capacity and how to get the necessary document in place around the issue of privacy by obtaining a client’s permission to communicate with others. Aging expertise from outside the financial services field is needed for all of these points. I hope everyone in the industry will pursue what FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) has suggested since 2008: that advisors put senior-specific policies in place to assist them in stemming the rising tide of elder financial abuse of their own aging clients.
Until next time,
Carolyn Rosenblatt
AgingParents.com
Aug 15, 2014 | aging, aging investor, elder investor, elderly, investor, senior citizen investor, senior investor
Doesn’t every financial advisor want to stand out from the crowd? Be better at delivering services? Somehow get a reputation as a cut above the average guy or gal in the biz?
If you are seeking to distinguish yourself, you can. The secret is not in getting better returns, finding unique ways to protect assets or getting it right with your investment strategies. It’s in offering a different service from the other guys in addition to doing all the money management, usual things well.
The different service we’re talking about is looking at your older client’s age, making a plan to look at all the aspects of their lives that are likely to change as they age and being an educator and advisor to help them plan for those things. This is not limited to figuring out how much your client will need in retirement. It goes way past that, and the issue of housing. Yes, your role as advisor will go beyond financial matters into the personal and the so called “soft skills’!
Does this make you uncomfortable? “I just manage money” you may be thinking. But the financial picture is connected to the person, who is usually connected to a family. The finances are not in a vacuum with no relation to an investor who is aging, and her needs as she gets older and may lose her ability to make sound financial decisions. This is not about merely preserving assets and making the money last. People are of course affected by the aging process, which brings with it risks. One of those risks is dementia and loss of financial capacity for accepting your advice. What then?
“I’ll worry about that when my client gets old” you say? The problem with that thinking is that you don’t know when your client is “getting old”. Dementia is a sneaky brain disease that usually develops over years. The signs are subtle. And dangerous. The risk of Alzheimer’s Disease, the most common kind of dementia doubles every 5 years after age 65. 5.2 million people already have it. Lots more are expected to develop it as Boomers age. One day, as you avoid conversations about possible loss of financial capacity, you may find that it is too late to get your client to sign anything, agree to anything, or worse yet, that he is a victim of financial abuse.
If you truly want to stand out as an advisor, not just for being a great producer, but for offering cutting edge service, get the training you need to make that service include skill in addressing and anticipating possible loss of capacity in your clients. Get the right document in place to protect your client and protect yourself from regulatory questions about privacy.
If you are considering this suggestions seriously, visit us at AgingInvestor.com and sign up for
one of our online courses. We’ve got the aging expertise you may not have yourself and you can get a lot smarter about aging clients as you get some training.
Meanwhile, think about becoming a unique service provider who is branching into an area no one can avoid: our populations is living longer than ever. You are in a great position to be a forward thinker about aging issues with your clients as a part of your work. You can take pride in it.
Until next time,
Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney
AgingInvestor.com
Jun 12, 2014 | aging, aging investor, Alzheimer's disease, investor
Alice, The Unsophisticated Investor
Alice, my mother in law, is blessed with a great memory and pretty good health for a woman of her age. She works at it. She’s been a widow for 6 years now. Dad always handled their finances. Since she’s been on her own, she relies on her two adult children and an accountant friend to guide her about her investments. She was referred to a financial advisor known by a family member. She thought things were fine until a year went by, the market was doing well and she had no gains at all in her portfolio. She’s comfortable, but not wealthy by most measures. There is enough to take care of her, though full time care would eat up a lot of what she has. Luckily at this time, she is able to remain independent.
When She Discovered The Truth
Alice decided to change financial advisors. It was then that she learned, to her dismay, that her other advisor had done something that really got her angry. He had taken 10% of her investable assets and put them into a real estate investment trust (REIT) that could not be liquidated without a substantial financial penalty to her. She is not savvy about complex investments and relies on others for advice. She relied on her advisor a lot. She is clear that she needs to watch out for herself. She says the advisor never told her what he was doing with this investment and never explained that she would not be able to access the funds if she needed them unless she suffered a loss, in the form of a penalty. He, of course says he told her all about it and she agreed. She doesn’t believe him. My husband, Mikol, interviewed her about this and put it on YouTube. Here’s what Alice has to say. http://tinyurl.com/pmqf3j2
In the July 14, 2013 InvestmentNews, Dan Jamieson reported that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the state regulator in MA are cracking down on exactly the kind of nontraditional, illiquid investment the financial advisor chose for Alice. Mr. Jamieson reports that In February, Massachusetts settled a case against LPL, which agreed to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines related to the sale of nontraded REITs.
State regulators in Massachusetts settled their cases against five high profile firms who agreed to pay a total of $6.1 million in restitution to investors, and fines totaling $975,000.
FINRA CRACKDOWN
State regulators aren’t the only ones cracking down on alternatives.
FINRA also warned members in 2012 in its annual exam priorities letter that it was “particularly concerned about sales practice abuses [and] yield-chasing behaviors” that might lead investors into unsuitable complex products.
Products under scrutiny by FINRA in 2013 included business development companies, structured products, nontraded REITs and private placements.
“Finra grinds us on structured notes and commodity-linked notes,” said the president of a broker-dealer organization, who asked not to be identified.
The regulators are reported to have found out that in the REIT cases, people didn’t know what they were investing in. We think that is true for Alice. We also think her advisor, knowing her lack of sophistication, took advantage of her for the sake of his commission. His justification is that “she didn’t need the money” and that “she was investing for the benefit of her heirs”. Her family, particularly her son, thinks that is rather arrogant of him. How does he know whether she’ll live to be 100 and whether she will need the money? Furthermore, Alice is not investing “for the benefit of her heirs” when she is relying on her funds to take care of her own needs for the rest of her life.
What We Did
As soon as we found out about the REIT sold to Alice, then 90, and how illiquid it was and for how long, we confronted the advisor with a letter and sent him a copy of the Investment News article. He called shortly afterwards. He tried to justify his actions, but was told very politely by my husband that Alice was to get full restitution or a FINRA complaint would be promptly filed.
Permission of various kinds had to be obtained. The advisor had left his firm and gone with a large bank. This messed things up for him for a time, but I thought he deserved it. This was the threat of a claim. Two lawyers called and argued how great the investment was. We held our own and continued to insist on full restitution for Alice. More excuses. Months of lawyering and letters later, she got full restitution. You’ve never seen more butt-covering letters from them.
The lesson here is to be smarter than this guy was. It’s not that the investment itself was bad. It paid a decent return. It’s that at her age it was clearly unsuitable. So keep the age of your client in mind and don’t make dumb assumptions like, “she didn’t need the money”. That is a foolish statement for anyone to make about a 90 year old with a relatively modest portfolio who could need hundreds of thousands of dollars of care as some seniors do before the ends of their lives.
If you need private advice about any aging client whose behavior makes you question the client’s financial capacity for decisions, call us. We have the expertise to help you assess the client’s abillity and we can guide you.
Don’t wait for FINRA to come knocking.
Until next time,
Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, Mediator
AgingInvestor.com
So, when you get this properly written, be sure that you have garnered about proofreading and editing services 10 points.
