FINRA – AgingInvestor

The DOL Fiduciary Standard & The Future: Your Client’s Heirs Are Watching You

Mar 16, 2018 | cost of aging, cost of long term care, financial advisors

With the recent Texas Court of Appeals decision striking down the authority of the DOL to enforce its fiduciary standard, the industry remains enmeshed in its own conflict. Some firms embraced the concept of acting in a client's best interests for retirement accounts. Others fought it tooth and nail. What about your own clients if you are a broker and do not have to follow the DOL rule? Do you think no one is going to question you, your advice, or your commissions and fees?

With the amount of publicity generated in the long fight to get the rule passed in the first place, and the aftermath efforts to have it overturned, the public is more aware than ever of the need for transparency in what you recommend and in what advice you offer. Some clients may trust you and never ask a question about why you suggest a product, but don't count on that being universal. The public's perception of what you do is changing and in a sense, the cat is out of the bag.

In their marketing, firms that embraced the fiduciary standard can brag about it and when you have rejected the premise of prioritizing a client's best interest, you can't brag about it. In fact, prospects may be asking more and more often whether you are a fiduciary. What are you going to tell them?

Here at AgingInvestor.com, we educate advisors of all stripes about managing aging clients, particularly those with diminished capacity. Our associated site, AgingParents.com, is a resource for those with aging loved ones. At AgingParents.com, we advise and counsel families about watching over their aging parents' finances and we strongly encourage them to review what their elders are doing with their money. When they follow our advice, they are going to be looking at what you've done with the elder's portfolio. If you adhere to a fiduciary standard, no problem is likely. If you don't, beware. Your client's heirs are gradually assuming power over their parents' investments as their loved ones age and become less capable of financial decision making. Dementia is a frequent cause of loss of capacity. Often the adult children can take over as successor trustees or agents who are appointed as power of attorney long before the parent passes.

About 70% of women change advisors after the death of their spouses. Their adult kids will be encouraging them to find someone with a fiduciary standard. Perhaps large numbers of adult children will switch advisors before the death of the patriarch, once they scrutinize what choices you have recommended. They may even get a second opinion about your work.

This is merely a caution to any advisor who does not adopt a fiduciary standard, regardless of whether it is mandated legally. The next generation is looking at a parent's portfolio with fresh eyes and you may lose clients because of this. Keep the older clients in your book for life and future generations by staying the course as an advocate and making decisions in their best interest, always.

<a href="https://agingparents.lpages.co/leadbox/14351a433f72a2%3A160053496b46dc/5696133603000320/" target="_blank" style="background: rgb(50, 100, 163); color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration: none; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; padding: 10px; display: inline-block; max-width: 300px; border-radius: 20px; text-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.25) 0px -1px 1px; box-shadow: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5) 0px 5px 3px inset, rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5) 0px 5px 3px;">10 Hidden Truths of Retirement and Long Term Care - Checklist</a><script data-leadbox="14351a433f72a2:160053496b46dc" data-url="https://agingparents.lpages.co/leadbox/14351a433f72a2%3A160053496b46dc/5696133603000320/" data-config="%7B%7D" type="text/javascript" src="https://agingparents.lpages.co/leadbox-1522784019.js"></script>

Myth Versus Reality: New Rule 2165 and Temporary Holds on Disbursements

Feb 13, 2018 | aging, aging investor, cost of aging, elder investor, finances for elders, financial advisors, financial capacity, financial elder abuse, financial judgement, finra, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, investor, power of attorney, senior investor, seniors finances

The regulators are trying. They want to help advisors protect aging clients from financial abuse. They don't want you to fear doing something wrong if you refrain from handing over assets to what looks like an abuser. But not living in the real world of how to stop abuse by determined abusers has its disadvantages. The new rule tells you who is at risk (elders and other impaired adults). It tells you that you just need a reasonable suspicion of abuse, not unquestioned evidence. It tells you what a temporary hold is and how long it can be: 15 days, 25 at max. Sounds ok. Until you actually know how long it takes for the legal steps to halt abuse.

Here at AgingInvestor.com we see this problem in the world of families and those who want to rip them off, not from inside an institutional setting or financial services firm. The world from here looks different from what FINRA imagines. There is usually no way anyone can stop abuse in 15 days or even in 25. We explain. In a real case, the kind this rule is designed to affect, we worked with family in an unfortunately typical situation of an unscrupulous son trying to squeeze money out of his 90 year old father who had dementia. The advisor had seen the pattern. He knew the son never did well on his own and he had been given handouts from dad for years. Dad, whom we'll call Joe, lived in a nursing home. He needed help with everything and his memory was shot. He was easily confused. Yet his advisor never questioned his ability to effect financial transactions. But when the son, we'll call Jake, brought his frail father into the advisor's office demanding $50,000 plus access to the cash management account, the advisor was sure it was abuse. He knew his client was too confused to disagree with Jake. The advisor dragged his feet and didn't provide the check his client had asked for, pushed by Jake, Over a month later, he felt obligated to give his client the $50K, which of course Jake got right away from Joe. The advisor didn't have Rule 2165 but he knew that Joe's daughter Rhoda was the appointed person as power of attorney and successor trustee. He didn't have permission to contact her, so he did it, as he said "on the QT". Rhoda was upset. She called us for advice. She found us through her own advisor who had the sense to send her to a resource who could answer her questions and guide her.

First we looked at the trust and what it said about Joe being removed as trustee or resigning as such. Two doctor's letters were needed, verifying that he was no longer competent to manage finances if he was to be removed as trustee. We advised her to get those letters asap. Rhoda lived out of state from Joe. She found the doctors and flew into town to take him to the appointments. Fortunately the doctors were able to say that Joe had indeed lost his capacity for handling his money. A couple of weeks after the appointments, Rhoda got the letters she needed. She then had to take them to Joe's estate planning attorney, who met with her and eventually gave her a Certificate of Trust, showing that she was now the successor to Joe and was in charge of his money. She then had to get the Certificate to his advisor's firm, which had to review it and after two weeks, they accepted it. Only then was Rhoda able to stop any further disbursements from Joe's account without her permission. Her brother was furious. His gravy train had stopped. The advisor had sent a debit card for the cash management account Joe requested under pressure to Rhoda, not to Joe. Rhoda destroyed it. Abuse stopped in its tracks.

Reality check: this scenario of stopping abuse involved a lawyer, an elder willing to go to two doctors, the cooperation of two doctors, travel between states, the approval of the Certificate of Trust with Rhoda's name on it through a process by the advisor's firm and a lot of time spent by Rhoda. The entire matter of protecting Joe from abuse took three months. Rule 2165 supposedly authorizes advisors to "take immediate action" when abuse is reasonably suspected. What is myth rather than reality is how long it takes to actually protect the elder and stop a predator. This was a case of undue influence by Jake who had a history of manipulating his father. And the new rule would not have helped at all. Jake would have happily waited for a mere 15 days to get his hands on the cash. Rhoda couldn't possibly get Joe removed as his own trustee without the doctors' letters. This sort of prerequisite of needing doctors to verify incapacity is commonly required in typical trusts. Perhaps the drafters of Rule 2165 never had to go through the process described here in their own lives. If they had, the new rule would provide for a 90 day authorization to hold transactions, rather than a maximum of 25 days. Maybe going forward when the myth gives way to reality, the rule will be revised. For now it is inadequate.

Dr. Mikol Davis and Carolyn Rosenblatt, co-founders of AgingInvestor.com

Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Elder Law Attorney offers a wealth of experience with aging to help you create tools so you can skillfully manage your aging clients. You will understand your rights and theirs so you can stay safe and keep them safe too.

Dr. Mikol Davis, Psychologist, Gerontologist offers in depth of knowledge about diminished financial capacity in older adults to help you strategize best practices so you can protect your vulnerable aging clients.

They are the authors of "Succeed With Senior Clients: A Financial Advisors Guide To Best Practice," and "Hidden Truths About Retirement And Long Term Care," available at AgingInvestor.com offers accredited cutting edge on-line continuing education courses for financial professionals wanting to expand their expertise in best practices for their aging clients. To learn more about our courses click HERE

The Hidden Truth About Adult Protective Services

Feb 13, 2017 | diminished cognition, elderly, financial capacity, financial elder abuse, finra, scammers, SEC

In all the proposed rules by FINRA and the SEC to address financial exploitation of seniors, advisors are urged to report suspected abuse to the local Adult Protective Services or to call the police. Unfortunately that is not always a solution. There seems to be a lack of clarity about how things work. Here's a typical scenario that illustrates an issue.

Myra is 87 and her daughter, Lexie has been taking advantage of her for years. Myra feels sorry for her daughter because she can't seem to hold a job. Never mind she has a drug habit. Myra has means and she often gives Lexie "loans" that are never repaid.

Lexie gets a power of attorney from Myra, goes with Myra to her financial advisor and tells the advisor that Myra needs $80,000 for a trip they are going to take. Myra is disabled and never travels. The advisor knows this. Advisor decides after seeing several of these demands for withdrawing Myra's funds under suspicious circumstances that Lexie is abusing Myra. The total amount withdrawn at Myra's request is over $150,000 in six months, which is highly unusual.

Advisor calls the police. They refer her to Adult Protective Services. APS takes a report over the phone, asks questions and then asks Advisor to fill out a report form. She fills it out and reports the recent questionable $80K demand and withdrawal and she lists the total taken of $150K. She puts Lexie's name on it as the person suspected of financially abusing Myra.

APS sends a social worker out to investigate the complaint and to visit Myra at home. Myra finds the worker to be very nice and they chat. "Has your daughter ever pressured you to give her money?" the worker asks. "No", says Myra. "Do you remember giving her gifts or loans totaling $150K this year?" the worker asks. "I don't think I did that"Myra says. The worker asks if she is in the habit of giving money gifts to Lexie and Myra says yes, that Lexie is her daughter and she needs some help sometimes. The worker concludes that giving money to Lexie is what Myra wants and the case does not go any further. No one has tested Myra to see if she is competent to understand the consequences of giving her assets to Lexie, particularly since she has two other adult children.

In this case the facts are not clear enough to prove that a crime was committed. APS will not recommend that Lexie be prosecuted because even though giving away money is not in Myra's best interests, she is assumed to be competent to do so. In this case APS is not solving any problem and takes no further action. If Myra did not want the funds to be given to Lexie it would be different and elder abuse could be proven perhaps. As is there is too much doubt about Myra agreeing to be taken advantage of by Lexie, no prosecutor could meet its burden of proof.

The Other Option

Lexie's other two siblings were not initially aware of the abuse by Lexie. Their potential inheritance is directly affected by their sister's actions and when they find out they call APS also. The case is closed and they get nowhere. They are furious.

They consider another option. If there is no crime here that can be proven, there may be a civil case. They contact an attorney who handles civil cases of elder financial abuse. The attorney does an investigation and finds out that Lexie has bought a condo with the money taken from Myra. The attorney successfully proves that Myra was duped by Lexie and the matter is settled by Lexie's attorney agreeing to sell the condo and give the proceeds back to a fund set up for Myra in case she needs more cash as she ages. And the settlement agreement says that Lexie will inherit no part of the fund. Further, the power of attorney Lexie got is torn up and Myra appoints a more responsible agent, another daughter who now oversees all of Myra's finances.

With a misunderstanding of how law enforcement works, there is a belief that all one must do is report to APS and somehow, financial abuse will be stopped. But when APS finds insufficient proof, or a wiling victim like Myra, they do not intervene. They are essentially reporters to law enforcement but APS does not prosecute anything. A civil case is outside their sphere and a civil attorney must be consulted to explore whether one can pursue that possible way of recovering an elder's assets that have been wrongfully taken.

The Takeaway

The important thing to know here is that APS is limited in what it can do. A criminal case of any kind has to be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt." Any advisor who wants to keep senior clients safer needs to understand that a willing victim will pretty well destroy a criminal case of abuse. A civil case is a possibility as long as there is an asset (in Lexie's case, a condo) to get and someone who is not a willing victim (in Lexie's case, her siblings). One should know a competent elder abuse attorney to consult and find out if your client has that choice in taking legal action or if her heirs do. Making a few calls is the least you can do to protect your client.

By Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Elder law attorney, AgingInvestor.com

Proving Value to Retired Clients: Creating a Financial & Personal Checklist

Oct 28, 2016 | aging, aging investor, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for seniors, investor, senior investor, seniors finances

Proving Value to Retired Clients: Creating a Financial Checklist

Many of us in this society have a very negative image about aging in general. We don't want to be "old". It is fueled by advertising on TV, movies, print media and other outlets with a consistent message: aging is bad, being younger and turning back the clock is good. We are a work ethic driven culture. When we are older and no longer "productive" we are generally seen as less valuable.

Then there is the fear and denial about dying and death. Our culture has been called the only one in the world that thinks of death as something optional. Note how we talk about it to family--"in case anything ever happens to me... Besides it being a fantasy that maybe something" won't happen to us, it keeps us from planning, from preparing our loved ones and from being responsible about our older years, possible declining health and the burden ignoring these things can put on our families. Reaching retirement age is a time to do planning about more than money.

Financial advisors are in the planning business. You look ahead, analyze, budget and calculate. But your clients may not be on the same page in your view of the future. They are busy being in denial that they may ever get ill and die. You can help them. In doing so, it may also make your job of talking about such issues as long term care, budgeting and spending easier.

Most people do not want to burden their loved ones. Most of them do not want to trouble adult children unnecessarily as they age. That is your best selling point for bringing up the personal matters. These include how every senior and every retiree needs to plan for things in their own lives that go beyond how much money they've saved and how it will be spent having a great retirement.

Here at AgingInvestor.com we see the messes people leave behind when they nurture the Great American Fantasy that losing independence won't happen to them and that they will live happily to age 100 and die peacefully in their sleep. Family members can spend years cleaning up the disaster their older loved ones leave because of failure to plan and take care of business. It is truly not fair to anyone. It leads to anger, resentment, family conflicts and sometimes to loss of wealth through ignorance. We've heard it and seen it countless times. We put a checklist together to help people avoid these disasters created by the fantasy.

What Can You Do About It?

You can give your clients this checklist next time you sit with them and review the portfolio. You can gently urge them to do what the list says is needed. We've broken down the essentials into 10 points, a "to do" list if you will. You can encourage them to take care of the items on the list, if they haven't already. In general, the to do list includes updating the estate plan, having critical documents in the right hands, providing necessary financial, computer and account information to trusted family and having a family meeting to educate one's heirs about the older person's affairs. This is how your client gets a family ready. This is how they avoid unduly burdening anyone. This is how they free their loved ones from distress and unnecessary work when they have to take action as an aging parent declines and passes away.

Some of your clients will brush off your suggestion. They love that Great American Fantasy and aren't about to give it up. Others will thank you as they have thanked us and will go forward. Their families will be forever grateful. You'll look like the caring, smart and responsible planner that you are.

Get your free Ebook and the Financial & Personal Checklist For Smart Retirees, click HERE.

By Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Elder Law Attorney, AgingInvestor.com