May 29, 2015 | aging, aging investor, diminished cognition, elder investor, elderly, financial elder abuse, finra, investor, medicare, scammers, senior citizen investor, senior investor
Most of us hear about unscrupulous family members taking advantage of their aging parents or grandparents. And everyone knows that internet scams abound. The one in which the scammer calls an elder and pretends to be a grandchild in trouble is notorious. And unfortunately, successful as it still goes on. Funds from grandma’s account get wired to Western Union and the thief disappears.
Financial elder abuse is rampant. The National Center On Elder Abuse puts the amount stolen from elders each year at $2.9B. But a privately run recent study calculated the amount at a shocking $36B+ per year. Who is doing this to our seniors?
Family members are the most frequent abusers of elders, because of access, exploiting the relationship of trust, and knowing just how easily manipulated a parent or other loved one can become with aging and dementia. Family members usually know how much money their parents have and how to get the parent to either give it to them or give them control over it so they can take it without the parent’s knowledge. Sadly, we see this often in our consulting work at AgingParents.com.
Caregivers, who also develop a relationship of trust with their care recipients, have the advantage of being with the elder in unsupervised situations. Ruthless caregivers get the elder to sign a power of attorney and being dependent on the caregiver, the elder may be fearful and intimidated if she does not acquiesce to the demands of the caregiver. In one case, a caregiver managed to steal $4M from a 74 year old client with multiple sclerosis who became physically unable to manage for herself. The caregiver got a power of attorney and opened 67 accounts in eleven banks. One bank finally caught on and reported their suspicions, but it was too late. The caregiver went to jail but the elder died before the criminal’s sentencing.
In spite of the easy access family and caregivers have to seniors, the most dollars are actually stolen from elders every year by professionals. That includes broker-dealers, insurance sales persons, lawyers and others in a position of both trust and authority to manipulate or outright steal elders’ funds. About a third of FINRA prosecutions involve elders. There are ripoff artists among us.
One thing that doesn’t seem to change over time is the reality that most cases of elder abuse go unreported to authorities and are therefore never prosecuted. The thieves get away with it. In one case we saw in our office, a 92 year old whose son had power of attorney for her took thousands of dollars from her bank account and refused to account for it. We were involved in helping her change the authority he had over her finances. I spoke with her and described that what her son had done was wrong and was a crime. She knew it was wrong and did not want to take action. Her response: “I don’t want my son prosecuted”.
Many elders are more frail and less willing to pursue legal remedies than a younger person may be. They suffer from shame, depression and embarrassment that they have been so taken in by anyone. Some just don’t have the energy to fight back and the thieves know this. They count on it.
What can the concerned financial professional do about financial abuse? There are ways you can be more vigilant and protective of clients than ever. Here are five things to keep in mind for any aging client.
- Know that even at the very earliest stages of dementia, a client is likely to be moderately impaired for making safe financial decisions. Pay attention to their ability or lack of it to understand complex or risky products such as non-traded REITS, which regulators disapprove of selling to seniors. Avoid suggesting or offering any products which require significant analysis by the client if you have even a hint of cognitive decline in that client.
- Know that age alone is a risk factor for developing dementia and its accompanying diminished capacity. By the time your clients reach age 85, at least a third of them will have Alzheimer’s Disease or other dementia. Two out of three persons affected by Alzheimer’s are women. Be especially vigilant with your aging female clients.
- Know your client. If he or she departs from a long standing spending pattern and you suddenly see unexplained large cash withdrawals, be suspicious, ask questions and probe. Someone could have gotten control over your client’s account. Don’t stand idly by. Get involved and find out. Report abuse if you suspect it. Take action to stop the abuse. Protect your client.
- If you work in an organization where professional colleagues have aging clients and there is opportunity to either sell them unsuitable investment products or otherwise manipulate these elders, lobby your organization for enhanced and more frequent scrutiny of all client accounts for people age 65 and up. The Federal Government and state laws define an “elder” as someone 65 and above. Watch those accounts more often and in more detail.
- Develop your own best practices, senior-specific policy, in writing. Training in best practices and commitment to your clients’ safety will enable you to get it right. Once you have a clear policy in place for yourself independently or for your organization, everyone can respond to red flags of diminished capacity and warning signs of elder abuse in a uniform way. That will enhance your ability to honor your clients so you can protect him from predators.
By Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Elder Law Attorney
AgingInvestor.com
May 7, 2015 | aging, diminished cognition, elderly, scammers, the gray zone
You hear the term now and again, “MCI”. Is it a diagnosis?

Doctors sometimes tell an older patient he has this, but no one seems to exactly pin down what it means. How mild is “mild” and what does it mean in terms of diminished capacity? Here it is in a nutshell:
Mild Cognitive Impairment refers to a degree of cognitive decline that is in between the cognitive changes associated with normal
aging and those associated with clinical features of dementia.
Many people who get a diagnosis of MCI do go on to develop dementia but some do not. Here’s an example of a person who has MCI but does not have dementia.
Gertrude is 89 years of age and has been living alone in her own home. She got confused on her way home and was found driving on the wrong side of the road. A Good Samaritan brought her home. Fortunately, she did not hit any other cars. Cognitive decline was the cause of her confusion. She has mild cognitive impairment. She must not drive anymore, and she is willing to admit that she has to give up the keys.
She can’t remember what is in her bank account. Recently there was fraudulent activity and a large amount of cash was stolen by hackers. She must also give up managing her own finances.
Gertrude is very independent. She can take care of herself physically, though she does need her cane to walk. She wears hearing aids, but is able to follow the conversation around her very well when she can hear. She is clear about her likes and dislikes and communicates them emphatically. She is oriented to the date, and place where she is. Her short term memory is poor. She should not live alone any longer as she could forget to turn off the stove or the water faucet.
Gertrude is a good example of a person in what we call “the gray zone”. She is partly independent and partly dependent now. She is able to do a lot for herself but she needs help with her finances particularly. She appointed a licensed fiduciary to handle her bills and watch her bank accounts for her. She and the fiduciary went to both her banks to make sure the fiduciary’s name is on the accounts. She will have a companion live in with her to keep an eye on her safety but still allow her to do the things around the house and in the community she likes to do. The companion will do the driving. As she gets older, her care needs will probably escalate. But for now, she has just what she needs and she accepts that her independence is getting limited by her memory loss.
If you know someone who seems to have the same issues as Gertrude, you will be interested in Chapter 10 of my book The Family Guide to Aging Parents: Answers to Your Legal, Financial and Healthcare Questions. That chapter is Protecting Our Aging Parents From Abuse. I offer you five good tips, steps you can take now to keep your loved one safe. They are Protective Measures: talk with them about financial abuse, educate yourself, start having more frequent contact, snoop a bit, and check the mail from time to time. Get your copy now and learn more, with all you need to know to keep someone like Gertrude safe! CLICK HERE.
Feb 3, 2015 | aging, aging investor, Alzheimer's disease, diminished cognition, elder investor, elderly, financial elder abuse, senior investor
Prior studies put the extent of financial elder abuse at $2.9 billion a year. A recent study finds that the actual amount stolen from elders is $36.48 billion a year. It’s no wonder that some call financial abuse “the crime of the century”. And yet, too many financial professionals see the warning signs and don’t know what to do or think that privacy concerns prevent them from doing anything.
I hope I can change your mind about the privacy issue. It should not stop you from doing the right thing.
According to the report of this recent study by True Link, a financial services company, the design of this survey was guided by recommendations of an expert panel of fraud researchers convened by the Financial Fraud Research Center at the Stanford Center on Longevity. That gives it credibility. No one has yet commented on any flaws in the study and I cannot say if there were any specific shortcomings, but the figure of over $36 billion is indeed startling.
Some of the most surprising study conclusions are that seniors who are younger, urban, and college-educated lose more money than those who are not. That somewhat defies the stereotype in other research suggesting that the isolated, lonely and unsophisticated senior would be the most vulnerable to loss. Another surprising finding is that legal but misleading tactics used to get a senior’s permission to take money from them leads to losses of $16.99 billion per year. The senior may be tricked into giving consent to credit card charges, for example and not realize how deeply or how long that consent ends up costing them.
So it’s not just the unsophisticated investor who gets taken by scammers. It can easily be your well educated client who thinks he knows more than you do and takes very foolish risks because he feels so capable of making decisions. Maybe he is impaired and doesn’t know it.
Or she gets sucked into long term contracts for things she doesn’t want or need. Once she gives approval for a credit card charge, she may be stuck with it. The study shows that people who start out losing a little each year tend to suffer increasing losses over time. A $20 a year loss can turn into a $2000 a year bilking and so on.
One thing every financial professional can do now is to develop a privacy waiver document specific to your organization or your management as an independent advisor that allows you to contact a trusted other whom your client has chosen, in the event that you see some red flags suggesting elder financial abuse.
If you’re unsure about what will give you a legally appropriate form for doing this, we can help you create one at AgingInvestor.com. Education and prevention of elder abuse are our mission. Everyone’s take on privacy may be different, but one thing is clear: you can’t continue to hide behind privacy as an excuse for doing nothing while your very own clients may be victims. Anything from telemarketer scams to undue influence by family to abuse by slick and unscrupulous salesmen of financial products that exploit older investors are everywhere around you.
One thing the study doesn’t explain directly is that it is also up to families to monitor their loved ones. True Link offers a product that allows monitoring of all an individual’s accounts in one place. Great, but what if the aging person won’t let family have access to the account information? That is a major issue. If you, as an advisor want to get involved, you can work with your client early enough that you have a clear policy in place when the time comes that your suspicions of abuse are raised. With a privacy waiver, you have the right to contact family or the person your client appointed to get the ball rolling on stopping abuse.
Caring and honest family need your help as a trusted professional to keep them alerted to any signs of trouble with an elder’s judgment about financial decisions. Some families are scattered all over and they may not have contact with your client about finances. You may not be able single-highhandedly to wipe out every abuse problem, but it seems clear that if you develop a clear policy for reporting danger signs and your suspicions of abuse, you can change the status quo.
You can sharpen your knowledge of an aging client and their financial capacity by completing one of our 6 C.E.
courses at AgingInvestor.com. Try the one on
understanding the signs of diminished capacity. Sign up today and get an hour of CFB accredited continuing education. Click
HERE.
Until next time,
Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney
AgingInvestor.com and AgingParents.com
Jun 12, 2014 | aging, aging investor, Alzheimer's disease, investor
When Competence Is Neither Black Nor White
Anyone who has spent time around older adults, whether they be family members, friends or your clients, probably knows someone who seems “with it” sometimes and “not with it” at other times. They can change from making sense to not making sense in a matter of minutes or hours. Do you think of this person as competent? Do you overlook all the little “slips” and signs of their not being able to track the conversation? Do you treat the person as if everything were fine and normal? Here at AgingInvestor.com, we refer to the in-between state of mind as the grey zone. It describes a person in a way that is neither black nor white, neither completely without decision-making ability nor completely safe in decision making. It is a variable problem and one nearly all of us are going to witness sooner or later. Why?
(more…)