Mar 16, 2015 | aging, aging investor, elder investor, elderly, financial elder abuse, investor, scammers, senior citizen investor, senior investor
Attention Financial Professionals: Are You A Hero? We want to highlight you!
We are very interested in financial planners, wealth managers, RIAs, CFPs, trust officers and others who have protected elderly clients from abuse or stopped it after they became aware of abuse or predatory practices. Without a fiduciary standard, inappropriate products are being sold to elders by some in the financial field. And that doesn’t even address the outside predators who seek out elderly victims. They’re everywhere.
At AgingInvestor.com we are allies of the elderly, having spent years of our lives serving them, my wife as a nurse and then a litigator and myself as a mental health provider.
We will be sponsoring a contest in early April to feature the best of the best in financial services who stopped or prevented elder abuse.
My wife and partner Carolyn Rosenblatt blogs at Forbes.com (Aging Parents) and AgingInvestor.com to keep those in this community informed. We want to tell your stories. We hope to educate others in the field and this community by highlighting the actions of courageous people who stepped up to stop scammers, thieves and greedy players inside or outside the financial services field itself. We have a few great candidates already! We know you’re out there. Submit your own name and story or that of someone you respect for their abuse prevention efforts to hero@aginginvestor.com. If you need to remain anonymous for political or personal reasons, we will honor that and not use your real name, location or work place. We want to share your exemplary actions. And if what you did was leave a large organization so you wouldn’t be part of abusive practices there, we think that’s heroic too. Please tell us. We’ll protect your identity totally.
Your stories will inspire others to follow your lead. We’ll feature you in our newsletter with your permission, and let our social media contacts know that you are a standout among the rest. If you want anonymity, we will simply point out the problems that spurred you take the steps you did and that we want to honor the decisions you made. We applaud you.
Thanks for joining us.
Sincerely,
Dr. Mikol Davis & Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney
AgingInvestor.com
Mar 12, 2015 | aging, elder investor, elderly, financial elder abuse, investor, scammers, senior citizen investor, senior investor
Heavy advertising by those selling reverse mortgages could convince anyone that this product will get you to nirvana. The sellers tout them, promising to let you “live the life of your dreams” or “have a better retirement”. Really?
The Federal government has responded to numerous complaints by borrowers about reverse mortgages (home equity conversion mortgages or HECMs) and issued a summary report. It’s available through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau but if you don’t have time to read it, we summarize for you it here at AgingInvestor.com.
The reverse mortgage complaints submitted to the CFPB demonstrate the wide range of problems some consumers have with these loans. The largest volume of complaints, according to the report, center on difficulty in trying to change the terms of the loans. When borrowers want to refinance the loan or add borrowers, they can’t. Some borrowers do not understand that the loan proceeds as well as accrued interest on the loan over time substantially decrease the amount of available equity. What this tells us at AgingInvestor.com is that despite mandatory “counseling” before getting the mortgage, the borrower is not getting the message. Whether that is a defect in the counseling itself or the consumer being swayed by the “live the life of your dreams” advertising we do not know. What we do know is that borrowers get upset when they find out they can’t refinance these loans.
Other consumers complain that lenders refuse to lower their loans’ interest rates and they feel that as interest rates have declined, that they’re being overcharged. Trying to change the terms of the loan at all is very problematic. When adult children want to be added as borrowers they can’t be added. Borrowers do not understand that adult children can only retain the home for an aging parent by paying off the entire loan balance or by paying 95% of the value of the home. Is this a failure to understand the mandatory counseling their parents were given? Or is it that this critical detail is lost in the effort to get an older homeowner to take the loan, “live the life of their dreams” and have a wonderful time with the loan proceeds?
As we see it, the worst outcome of a reverse mortgage occurs when title is transferred to one spouse in order to get the HECM, perhaps because he or she is of an age that makes it possible to borrow more equity than the other spouse could do. The loan is taken in the name of that one spouse only. The borrowing spouse later dies. The non-borrowing spouse then will lose the home. Distraught widows and widowers face foreclosure in this scenario. Of course they can’t pay off the loan or they wouldn’t have needed the HECM in the first place. Some consumers report that their loan originator falsely assured them they would be able to add the other spouse to the loan at a later date.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is changing this horrible problem. It issued a mortgagee letter in August 2014 that provides that non-borrowing spouses meeting certain conditions, may remain in the home after the death of the borrower spouse but only for loans originated after the date of this letter. Most HECMs originated after August 4, 2014 will be made in both spouses’ names. For the rest of the many borrowers whose loans are older than that, a widowed person will likely lose the home after the borrowing spouse dies. So much for living the life of their dreams.
If you are in a position to advise clients about the pros and cons of a reverse mortgage, be sure that you know these details before directing anyone to such a loan. Yes, in some cases, a HECM can be a lifesaver. But as we see it, that’s only a good idea when there are no other options available to pay the basic cost of living in the home and surviving there to the end of life. It’s not prudent for any consumer to have a lavish lifestyle on borrowed money, only to run out of equity when they need money most: when disabled and in need of care. Consumers need to be cautioned not to take out equity and recklessly spend it as if there were no consequences to depleting what is for many, their only significant asset.
Help us keep elders informed. Please share this with a friend, a client or member of your own family.
Until next time,
Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, Mediator
Dr. Mikol Davis, Psychologist, Gerontologist
Feb 13, 2015 | aging, aging investor, elder investor, elderly, financial elder abuse, investor, scammers, senior citizen investor, senior investor
When Laura called me at the urging of her own financial advisor, she was in a crisis. Her father, Jack, age 95 lived in another state and was in a nursing home. She and her sister were worried about a problem: their brother Robbie was taking advantage of their dad and no one was stopping him.
Robbie had been sponging off of Dad for years, Laura told me. She knew Jack probably had dementia, and she had been appointed his Power of Attorney agent, but the transition had not happened yet for her to take over his finances. Robbie had flown out to see Dad from the state where Robbie lived. He took his frail father to Jack’s financial advisor and had his Dad ask the advisor to give Dad a cashier’s check for $50,000. The advisor knew that his client was being manipulated into asking for the money but he gave it to Jack anyway. It was not as if Jack was extremely wealthy. He had limited funds in the account.
Then Jack, with Robbie prodding him, asked his advisor to give him a debit card for his cash management account. The advisor knew full well that Jack’s money could go out the door and into Robbie’s pocket. He decided to deal with the potential abuse by “dragging his feet” for three months. He knew Laura and knew that she was Jack’s agent on his legal documents. He called her describing the call as “on the Q.T”and told Laura that he “had” to comply with the request for the debit card. Laura insisted as the power of attorney that the card should be mailed to her. After she got it, I advised her to destroy it.
The estate attorney who had prepared Jack’s trust knew that Laura should take over her position as Jack’s successor, but he failed to urge her to do so right away. He also failed to give her enough direction about how to accomplish this so she could stop any other actions by Robbie to get Jack’s money. This was one professional failure—the lawyer did not recognize the urgency nor try enough to stop elder abuse.
When I met with Laura, I instructed her exactly how to get the needed doctors’ reports on Dad to meet the requirements Jack’s trust had in it that would permit her to take over responsibility for him. She did so at my urging, right away. I encouraged her to immediately give Dad’s advisor a letter instructing him to cease any transactions initiated by Jack as Jack did indeed have dementia and the doctors had verified that he was no longer capable of managing his affairs. She did that, too. It had also come to light that Robbie had gotten Dad to transfer funds into an account to which Robbie had access and that Robbie had already nearly drained that account of another $30,000.
I sat with Laura and helped her draft a firm letter to Robbie letting him know that the end had come for manipulating Dad and that she was now in charge. He was furious! Ugly emails from Robbie and threats followed. The saga did not end there, but with help, Laura was able to stop any further financial abuse of her father.
The second and most distressing failure of a professional in this true story was the action by Jack’s financial advisor. He did not seem to have any idea of what to do to stop elder abuse that he admitted was going on in dealing with his client
The takeaway here is that every advisor who sees potential elder abuse can and should do much more to protect an elderly client from this kind of manipulation. Every professional has to give up being a slave to the outdated notion that you always have to do what a client says even if the client is seriously impaired. That impaired person is not the client you signed up and you must address this problem.
Learn 5 things every professional should do when you suspect financial abuse by clicking HERE for your free tip sheet.
Until next time,
Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Elder Law Attorney
Dr. Mikol Davis, Psychologist, Gerontologist
Feb 9, 2015 | aging, aging investor, diminished cognition, elder investor, elderly, financial elder abuse, scammers, senior citizen investor, senior investor
Imagine you’re at your desk, calling your elderly client for approval of something you’d like to do with his portfolio. The last time you spoke with him, he seemed a little “out of it” but you carried on and did your work. Now, you’re on a call with him again and he’s just not getting anything you’re saying. You repeat patiently. Nothing. You suggest talking to him at a later time.
When you call back two days later, your client has no recollection of the earlier conversation that had you concerned, and worse yet, he still can seem to grasp even the simplest explanation of why you’re calling.
What should you do?
Your client has presented some ominous signs of cognitive impairment, which include inability to track the conversation and memory loss. He has no memory of your call two days earlier. Prompting him by reminding him of when it was and what you said didn’t help.
If you know there is a problem, there is one major reason why you absolutely must do something about it. That is: clients who are developing cognitive impairment are sitting ducks for financial abuse. The abuse could come from a family member, which is an unfortunately common occurrence. It could come from a credit card company who tricks your client into signing up for years of something she doesn’t want or need. It could come from an internet scammer who preys on people exactly like your client, cleverly and with great success. As you may have heard, the latest study on financial elder abuse found that it costs our seniors $36.48 billion a year, rather than the previous estimate of $2.9 billion.
If you believe that confidentiality prevents you from sharing anything about your client with anyone else, take you cue from the Canon of Ethics for lawyers, who have to honor confidentiality as much as anyone can. It says, paraphrasing, that a lawyer may but is not required to
take protective action if a client is in danger. In my mind, any ethical lawyer who believes reasonably that her client is in danger from potential financial abuse is going to take protective action. When you see a client too confused to follow your conversation and too impaired to remember a call two days before, that client may be in danger right now. If protective action means calling a designated emergency contact, then you should do it. If it means taking the matter to supervisory or compliance personnel in your organization, then do that as well. If you believe you have no other choice but to get rid of your client and no longer handle his finances or business affairs, then that is also a choice. However, we at
AgingInvestor.com think you do have options other than firing your impaired client.
When we look at the law, it builds in protections for those who lose the ability to manage finances for themselves. One of these is a Durable Power of Attorney. Every prudent person who gets estate planning done should have a DPOA as part of the estate planning package. Take your cue from what the law allows any adult to do. That is, everyone should appoint a trusted person to take over when he or she is no longer able to manage finances independently. You client should appoint someone you can call and most importantly give you permission to call or contact that appointed person when your client demonstrates behavior as we described above. The person your client has designated on the DPOA to be her agent may also be the one she give you permission to contact if you believe she is vulnerable to abuse.
Every advisor, business professional and lawyer serving older clients should have permission to contact a third party in the event of emergency or imminent danger. You can get it done with a straightforward document.
If you aren’t sure how to get a waiver of privacy done or whom your client wants to designate, it’s time to act now. Get these things accomplished with the help of experts who can guide you. If you have them in your organization or at your disposal, create your policy without any delay. If you need help, we’re here to offer it at
AgingInvestor.com. Contact us for advice, help with drafting your own special privacy waiver, or education about how to bring up the subject of cognitive impairment with your aging clients.
Until next time,
Carolyn Rosenblatt & Dr Mikol Davis
Feb 3, 2015 | aging, aging investor, Alzheimer's disease, diminished cognition, elder investor, elderly, financial elder abuse, senior investor
Prior studies put the extent of financial elder abuse at $2.9 billion a year. A recent study finds that the actual amount stolen from elders is $36.48 billion a year. It’s no wonder that some call financial abuse “the crime of the century”. And yet, too many financial professionals see the warning signs and don’t know what to do or think that privacy concerns prevent them from doing anything.
I hope I can change your mind about the privacy issue. It should not stop you from doing the right thing.
According to the report of this recent study by True Link, a financial services company, the design of this survey was guided by recommendations of an expert panel of fraud researchers convened by the Financial Fraud Research Center at the Stanford Center on Longevity. That gives it credibility. No one has yet commented on any flaws in the study and I cannot say if there were any specific shortcomings, but the figure of over $36 billion is indeed startling.
Some of the most surprising study conclusions are that seniors who are younger, urban, and college-educated lose more money than those who are not. That somewhat defies the stereotype in other research suggesting that the isolated, lonely and unsophisticated senior would be the most vulnerable to loss. Another surprising finding is that legal but misleading tactics used to get a senior’s permission to take money from them leads to losses of $16.99 billion per year. The senior may be tricked into giving consent to credit card charges, for example and not realize how deeply or how long that consent ends up costing them.
So it’s not just the unsophisticated investor who gets taken by scammers. It can easily be your well educated client who thinks he knows more than you do and takes very foolish risks because he feels so capable of making decisions. Maybe he is impaired and doesn’t know it.
Or she gets sucked into long term contracts for things she doesn’t want or need. Once she gives approval for a credit card charge, she may be stuck with it. The study shows that people who start out losing a little each year tend to suffer increasing losses over time. A $20 a year loss can turn into a $2000 a year bilking and so on.
One thing every financial professional can do now is to develop a privacy waiver document specific to your organization or your management as an independent advisor that allows you to contact a trusted other whom your client has chosen, in the event that you see some red flags suggesting elder financial abuse.
If you’re unsure about what will give you a legally appropriate form for doing this, we can help you create one at AgingInvestor.com. Education and prevention of elder abuse are our mission. Everyone’s take on privacy may be different, but one thing is clear: you can’t continue to hide behind privacy as an excuse for doing nothing while your very own clients may be victims. Anything from telemarketer scams to undue influence by family to abuse by slick and unscrupulous salesmen of financial products that exploit older investors are everywhere around you.
One thing the study doesn’t explain directly is that it is also up to families to monitor their loved ones. True Link offers a product that allows monitoring of all an individual’s accounts in one place. Great, but what if the aging person won’t let family have access to the account information? That is a major issue. If you, as an advisor want to get involved, you can work with your client early enough that you have a clear policy in place when the time comes that your suspicions of abuse are raised. With a privacy waiver, you have the right to contact family or the person your client appointed to get the ball rolling on stopping abuse.
Caring and honest family need your help as a trusted professional to keep them alerted to any signs of trouble with an elder’s judgment about financial decisions. Some families are scattered all over and they may not have contact with your client about finances. You may not be able single-highhandedly to wipe out every abuse problem, but it seems clear that if you develop a clear policy for reporting danger signs and your suspicions of abuse, you can change the status quo.
You can sharpen your knowledge of an aging client and their financial capacity by completing one of our 6 C.E.
courses at AgingInvestor.com. Try the one on
understanding the signs of diminished capacity. Sign up today and get an hour of CFB accredited continuing education. Click
HERE.
Until next time,
Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney
AgingInvestor.com and AgingParents.com
